| | 32004L0018: c3-VII.D.p1Design contest notices    
| 32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) | Annex VII.D.p1 | ANNEX VII D
INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR IN DESIGN CONTEST NOTICES
CONTEST NOTICES
1. Name, address, fax number and email address of the contracting authority and those of the service from which the additional documents may be obtained
2. Description of the project
3. Type of contest: open or restricted
4. In the event of an open contest: time limit for the submission of projects
5. In the event of a restricted contest:
(a) number of participants contemplated
(b) names of the participants already selected, if any
(c) criteria for the selection of participants
(d) time limit for requests to participate
6. If appropriate, indicate that the participation is restricted to a specified profession
7. Criteria which will be applied in the evaluation of the projects
8. Names of any members of the jury who have already been selected
9. Indicate whether the jury's decision is binding on the contracting authority
10. Number and value of any prizes
11. Payments to be made to all participants, if any
12. Indicate whether any contracts following the contest will or will not be awarded to the winner or winners of the contest
13. Date of dispatch of the notice | | 32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) | Annex XVIII | ANNEX XVIII
INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DESIGN CONTEST NOTICE
1. Name, address, electronic address telephone, telex and fax numbers of the contracting authority and of the service from which additional documents may be obtained.
2. Project description (nomenclature reference No(s)).
3. Nature of the contest: open or restricted.
4. In the case of open contests: final date for receipt of projects.
5. In the case of restricted contests:
(a) the number of participants envisaged, or range;
(b) where applicable, names of participants already selected;
(c) criteria for the selection of participants;
(d) final date for receipt of requests to participate.
6. Where applicable, indication of whether participation is reserved to a particular profession.
7. Criteria to be applied in the evaluation of projects.
8. Where applicable, names of the selected members of the jury.
9. Indication of whether the decision of the jury is binding on the authority.
10. Where applicable, number and value of prizes.
11. Where applicable, details of payments to all participants.
12. Indication of whether the prize-winners are permitted any follow-up contracts.
13. Name and address of the body responsible for the appeal and, where appropriate, mediation procedures. Precise information concerning the time limit for lodging appeals, or, if need be, the name, address, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address of the service from which this information may be obtained.
14. Date of dispatch of the notice.
15. Date of receipt of the notice by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16. Any other relevant information | | 32005R1564 - Second joint amendment of Classic and Utilities (3rd generation) | Annex XII=C-VII.D.p1 & U-XVIII | | Standard form 12: Design contest notice | | 31992L0050 - Services (2nd generation) | Annex IV.A | ANNEX IV
A. Design contest notice
1. Name, address, telegraphic address, telephone, telex and fax numbers of the contracting authority and of the service from which additional documents may be obtained.
2. Project description.
3. Nature of the contest: open or restricted.
4. In the case of open contests: final date for receipt of projects.
5. In the case of restricted contests:
(a) the number of participants envisaged;
(b) where applicable, names of participants already selected;
(c) criteria for the selection of participants;
(d) final date for receipt of requests to participate.
6. Where applicable, indication of whether participation is reserved to a particular profession.
7. Criteria to be applied in the evaluation of projects.
8. Where applicable, names of the selected members of the jury.
9. Indication of whether the decision of the jury is binding on the contracting authority.
10. Where applicable, number and value of prizes.
11. Where applicable, details of payments to all participants.
12. Indication of whether the prize-winners are permitted any follow-up contracts.
13. Other information.
14. Date of dispatch of the notice.
15. Date of receipt of the notice by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. | | 31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) | Annex XVII | ANNEX XVII
DESIGN CONTEST NOTICES 1. Name, address, telegraphic address, telephone, telex and fax numbers of the contracting entity and of the service from which the relevant documents may be obtained.
2. Project description.
3. Nature of the contest: open or restricted.
4. In the case of open contests: final date for receipt of projects.
5. In the case of restricted contests:
(a) the envisaged number of participants, or range;
(b) where applicable, names of already selected participants;.
(c) the criteria to be applied in the selection of participants;
(d) final date for receipt of requests to participate.
6. Where applicable, indication whether participation is reserved to a particular profession.
7. Criteria to be applied in the evaluation of projects.
8. Where applicable, names of selected members of the jury.
9. Indication whether the decision of the jury is binding for the authority.
10. Where applicable, the number and value of the prizes to be awarded.
11. Where applicable, details on payments to all participants.
12. Indication whether the prizewinners are entitled to be awarded any follow-up contracts.
13. Other information.
14. Date of dispatch of the notice.
15. Date of receipt of the notice by the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. | | 32001L0078 - Second joint amendment of Classic and Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 1.3>VI.Sta10=S2-IV.A + 1.4>XI.Sta10=U2-XVII | 3. Annexes III and IV to Directive 92/50/EEC shall be replaced by Annexes V and VI respectively to this Directive.
4. Annexes XII to XV, XVII and XVIII to Directive 93/38/EEC shall be replaced by Annexes VII to XII respectively to this directive. | | 32001L0078(01) - Corrigendum to second joint amendment of Classic and Utilities (2nd generation) | New standard form 10 | | Standard form 10: Design contest notice |
| Case | Pte | Ref | Text | N-080627
Danske Arkitektvirksomheder | 1-2+K1 | C3-70
P3A2-XII=C3-VII.D.p1 & U3-XVIII | Ad påstand 1
1. Som erkendt af indklagede har indklagede ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen anført de kriterier, der ville blive lagt til grund ved vurderingen af projekterne, og indklagede har dermed tilsidesat kravene i Udbudsdirektivets artikel 70, jf. bilag VII D, nr. 7, til indholdet af udbudsbekendtgørelsen.
2. Påstanden tages derfor til følge.
.....
K1. Ad påstand 1 Indklagede har handlet i strid med Udbudsdirektivets artikel 70, jf. Bilag VII, D nr. 7, ved ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen at have anført de kriterier, der ville blive lagt til grund ved vurderingen af projekterne. | N-050408
Danske Arkitektvirksomheder | 5-7+K1 | S2-13.6.2
S2-15.3
S2-17.2.3
S2-IV.A | 5. Det følger af Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 15, stk. 3, jf. artikel 17, jf. bilag IV, punkt IV. 2, at en udbyder, der ønsker at udskrive en projektkonkurrence, skal tilkendegive sin hensigt herom ved en bekendtgørelse. I udbudsbekendtgørelsen skal fastsættes de kriterier, der vil blive anvendt ved evalueringen af projekter.
6. Dommerkomitéens afgørelser vedtages alene ud fra de kriterier, der er fastsat i bekendtgørelsen i henhold til artikel 15, stk. 3, jf. artikel 13, stk. 6.
7. Da indklagede ikke allerede i udbudsbekendtgørelsen med tilstrækkelig tydelighed havde fastsat, at størrelsen af honorartilbudene ville indgå som et bedømmelseskriterium under projektkonkurrencen, tages påstanden til følge.
.....
K1. Indklagede har handlet i strid med Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 13 og det EU-udbudsretlige gennemsigtighedsprincip ved at tillade, at dommerkomitéen lod tilbudene på honorar for ydelse af teknisk rådgivning og bistand indgå som et bedømmelseskriterium for beslutningen om udvælgelsen af det bedste forslag, uanset at indklagede ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen havde fastsat, at dette ville indgå som et kriterium for denne beslutning. |
|
|
