NORDIC PROCUREMENT ENFORCEMENT
  LEGAL RESEARCH PROJECT
   

   
 
 
 
    
 
 
Previous
Up
Next		   
   
c3-28.1
c3-28.2
u1-15.stm
c3-29
c3-30.1.s1
c3-30.1.a
c3-30.1.b
c3-30.1.c
c3-30.1.d
npl2-12.3.p2+4-5
c3-30.2-4
npl2bk2-2.3
c3-31.s1
c3-31.1.a
c3-31.1.b
c3-31.1.c
c3-31.2.a
c3-31.2.b
c3-31.2.c
c3-31.2.d
c3-31.3
c3-31.4.a
c3-31.4.b
u3-40.3.i
u3-40.3.j
g1-6.1.h
w1-9.2
c3-32.1
c3-32.2.1
c3-32.2.2.s1
c3-32.2.2.s2
c3-32.2.3
c3-32.2.4
c3-32.2.5
c3-32.3
c3-32.4.1
c3-32.4.2
c3-33.1
c3-33.2
c3-33.3
c3-33.4
c3-33.5
c3-33.6
c3-33.7
c3-34.1-2
c3-34.3

32004L0018: c3-32.2.2.s1

Contracts

EU Law Community DK Law EU Cases DK Cases

EU Law

32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) Article 32.2.2.s1
Contracts based on a framework agreement shall be awarded in accordance with the procedures laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4.
32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) Article 14.2-3
2. Where contracting entities have awarded a framework agreement in accordance with this Directive, they may avail themselves of Article 40(3)(i) when awarding contracts based on that framework agreement.
    3. Where a framework agreement has not been awarded in accordance with this Directive, contracting entities may not avail themselves of Article 40(3)(i).
31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) Article 5.2-3
2. Where contracting entities have awarded a framework agreement in accordance with this Directive, they may avail themselves of Article 20 (2) (i) when awarding contracts based on that agreement.
    3. Where a framework agreement has not been awarded in accordance with this Directive, contracting entities may not avail themselves of Article 20 (2) (i).
31990L0531 - Utilities (1st generation) Article 5.2-3
2. Where contracting entities have awarded a framework agreement in accordance with this Directive, they may avail themselves of Article 15 (2) (i) when awarding contracts based on that agreement.
3. Where a framework agreement has not been awarded in accordance with this Directive, contracting entities may not avail themselves of Article 15 (2) (i).

EU Cases

Case PteRefText
    

DK Cases

Case PteRefText
N-980702
Foreningen af Rådgivende Ingeniører 		1+K1U2-5.2
U2-20.2.i		1. De ændringer vedrørende ingeniørfirmaernes erstatningsansvar, som indklagede ønskede indsat i kontrakterne med Moe og Brødsgaard A/S og Cowi A/S afviger efter deres indhold så meget fra de tilsvarende bestemmelser i den delaftale, som indgik i rammeaftalerne med de 2 ingeniørfirmaer, at indklagede ikke kunne indgå disse aftaler på grundlag af disse rammeaftaler. Indklagede har derfor handlet i strid med Forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivets artikel 5, stk. 2, jf. artikel 20, stk. 2, litra i, sammenholdt med artikel 20, stk. 1, ved at indgå de 2 aftaler.
    .....
    K1. Indklagede, Københavns Lufthavne A/S, har handlet i strid med Forsyningsvirksomhedsdirektivets artikel 5, stk. 2, ved at indgå 2 delaftaler med de rådgivende ingeniørfirmaer Moe og Brødsgaard A/S og Cowi A/S, med følgende bestemmelser: a. de rådgivende ingeniørfirmaers rådgiveransvar er uden beløbsmæssige begrænsninger, b. de rådgivende ingeniørfirmaers tilsynsansvar er uden beløbsmæssige begrænsninger, samt c. de rådgivende ingeniørfirmaer er solidarisk ansvarlige med eventuelle medskadevoldere.