NORDIC PROCUREMENT ENFORCEMENT
  LEGAL RESEARCH PROJECT
   

   
 
 
 
    
 
 
Previous
Up
Next
   
   
c3-66.1
c3-66.2
c3-67.1
c3-67.2
c3-68
c3-69.1
c3-69.2.1
c3-69.2.2+69.3
c3-70
c3-71
u3-65.1
c3-72
c3-73
c3-74

32004L0018: c3-73

Composition of the jury

EU Law Community DK Law EU Cases DK Cases

EU Law

32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) Article 73
Article 73
    Composition of the jury
    The jury shall be composed exclusively of natural persons who are independent of participants in the contest. Where a particular professional qualification is required from participants in a contest, at least a third of the members of the jury shall have that qualification or an equivalent qualification.
32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) Article 65.3
3. The jury shall be composed exclusively of natural persons who are independent of participants in the contest. Where a particular professional qualification is required of participants in a contest, at least a third of the jury members shall have the same qualification or an equivalent qualification.
31992L0050 - Services (2nd generation) Article 13.6.1
6. The jury shall be composed exclusively of natural persons who are independent of participants in the contest. Where a particular professional qualification is required from participants in a contest, at least a third of its members must have the same qualification or its equivalent.
31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) Article 23.6.1
6. The jury shall be composed exclusively of natural persons who are independent of participants in the contest. Where a particular professional qualification is required from participants in a contest, at least a third of its members must have the same qualification or its equivalent.

EU Cases

Case PteRefText
    

DK Cases

Case PteRefText
N-980309
Foreningen af Rådgivende Ingeniører
K3-4S2-13.6.1
S2-13.6.2
K3. Indklagede har handlet i strid med Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 13, stk. 6, 1. og 2. pkt., ved at sammensætte dommerkomitéen med 9 medlemmer, uden at en tredjedel af medlemmerne af dommerkomitéen havde samme eller tilsvarende kvalifikationer som tilbudsgiverne, idet der kun var 2 sagkyndige medlemmer i dommerkomitéen.
    K4. Indklagede har handlet i strid med Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 13, stk. 6, 1. og 2. pkt., ved at sammensætte dommerkomitéen således, at intet sagkyndigt medlem af dommerkomitéen havde samme eller tilsvarende kvalifikationer som de tilbudsgivere, som var rådgivende ingeniører.