| | 32004L0018: c3-70Form and manner of publication of notices of contests    
| 32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) | Article 70 | Article 70
Form and manner of publication of notices of contests
1. The notices referred to in Article 69 shall contain the information referred to in Annex VII D in accordance with the standard model notices adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure in Article 77(2).
2. The notices shall be published in accordance with Article 36(2) to (8). | | 32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) | Article 63.2 | | 2. Article 44(2) to (8) shall also apply to notices relating to design contests. | | 32005R1564 - Second joint amendment of Classic and Utilities (3rd generation) | Article 1+2 | Article 1
Contracting entities shall, from the date of entry into force of the respective national measures transposing Directive 2004/17/EC and from 1 February 2006 at the latest, use, for the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the notices referred to in Articles 41 to 44 and 63 of that Directive, the standard forms set out in Annexes IV to IX, XII and XIII to this Regulation.
Article 2
Contracting authorities shall, from the date of entry into force of respective national measures transposing Directive 2004/18/EC and from 1 February 2006 at the latest, use, for the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the notices referred to in Articles 35, 36, 58, 64, 69 and 70 of that Directive, the standard forms set out in Annexes I, II, III and VIII to XIII to this Regulation. | | 31992L0050 - Services (2nd generation) | Article 17.2.3 | | The notice referred to in Article 16 (1) shall be sent at the latest forty-eight days after the award of the contract in question or the closure of the design contest in question. | | 31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 25 | Article 25
1. The contracting entities must be able to supply proof of the date of dispatch of the notices referred to in Articles 20 to 24.
2. The notices shall be published in full in their original language in the Official Journal of the European Communities and in the TED data bank. A summary of the important elements of each notice shall be published in the other official languages of the Community, the original text alone being authentic.
3. The Office for Official Publications of the European Communities shall publish the notices not later than 12 days after their dispatch. In exceptional cases it shall endeavour to publish the notice referred to in Article 21 (1) (a) within five days in response to a request by the contracting entity and provided that the notice has been sent to the Office by electronic mail, telex or telefax. Each edition of the Official Journal of the European Communities which contains one or more notices shall reproduce the model notice or notices on which the published notice or notices is/are based.
4. The cost of publication of the notices in the Official Journal of the European Communities shall be borne by the Communities.
5. Contracts or design contests in respect of which a notice is published in the Official Journal of the European Communities pursuant to Article 21 (1) or (4) shall not be published in any other way before that notice has been dispatched to the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Such publication shall not contain information other than that published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. |
| Case | Pte | Ref | Text | N-080627
Danske Arkitektvirksomheder | 1-2+K1 | C3-70
P3A2-XII=C3-VII.D.p1 & U3-XVIII | Ad påstand 1
1. Som erkendt af indklagede har indklagede ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen anført de kriterier, der ville blive lagt til grund ved vurderingen af projekterne, og indklagede har dermed tilsidesat kravene i Udbudsdirektivets artikel 70, jf. bilag VII D, nr. 7, til indholdet af udbudsbekendtgørelsen.
2. Påstanden tages derfor til følge.
.....
K1. Ad påstand 1 Indklagede har handlet i strid med Udbudsdirektivets artikel 70, jf. Bilag VII, D nr. 7, ved ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen at have anført de kriterier, der ville blive lagt til grund ved vurderingen af projekterne. | N-050408
Danske Arkitektvirksomheder | 5-7+K1 | S2-13.6.2
S2-15.3
S2-17.2.3
S2-IV.A | 5. Det følger af Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 15, stk. 3, jf. artikel 17, jf. bilag IV, punkt IV. 2, at en udbyder, der ønsker at udskrive en projektkonkurrence, skal tilkendegive sin hensigt herom ved en bekendtgørelse. I udbudsbekendtgørelsen skal fastsættes de kriterier, der vil blive anvendt ved evalueringen af projekter.
6. Dommerkomitéens afgørelser vedtages alene ud fra de kriterier, der er fastsat i bekendtgørelsen i henhold til artikel 15, stk. 3, jf. artikel 13, stk. 6.
7. Da indklagede ikke allerede i udbudsbekendtgørelsen med tilstrækkelig tydelighed havde fastsat, at størrelsen af honorartilbudene ville indgå som et bedømmelseskriterium under projektkonkurrencen, tages påstanden til følge.
.....
K1. Indklagede har handlet i strid med Tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 13 og det EU-udbudsretlige gennemsigtighedsprincip ved at tillade, at dommerkomitéen lod tilbudene på honorar for ydelse af teknisk rådgivning og bistand indgå som et bedømmelseskriterium for beslutningen om udvælgelsen af det bedste forslag, uanset at indklagede ikke i udbudsbekendtgørelsen havde fastsat, at dette ville indgå som et kriterium for denne beslutning. |
|
|
